Why Helen Mirren Was the Most Notable Celebrity of Super Bowl 50

Sim­ply Put, Bud­weis­er’s Super Bowl fea­tur­ing Helen Mir­ren, was­n’t an abject fail­ure. But it’s hard to call it a suc­cess either. Here’s why.

Lisa Lacy By Lisa Lacy. Join the discussion » 0 comments

In a par­tic­u­lar­ly celebri­ty-heavy Super Bowl, Bud­weis­er, per­haps the most pow­er­ful adver­tis­er in the game’s his­to­ry, opt­ed to use 70-year-old Oscar-win­ning actress Helen Mir­ren in one of its high­ly antic­i­pat­ed spots, Sim­ply Put. Beyond just com­ing from Bud­weis­er, which in and of itself com­mands atten­tion on Super Bowl Sun­day, the ad was also note­wor­thy for its mes­sage and deliv­ery.

Super Bowl ads typ­i­cal­ly don’t fea­ture women front and cen­ter with­out skin and innu­en­do. And we don’t usu­al­ly hear brands dis­cour­ag­ing us from con­sum­ing their prod­ucts. Opti­mists could say this is a gen­uine attempt on Budweiser’s behalf to tack­le a social ill. Pes­simists, on the oth­er hand, might say it’s sim­ply a ploy to cut through noise on a par­tic­u­lar­ly loud night. Then again, it could be a bit of both.

The King Of Beers And The Queen

Accord­ing to the brand, Bud­weis­er chose Mir­ren to talk about drunk dri­ving because she “pro­vides an unmatched lev­el of grav­i­tas” and, per a rep, “She has stop­ping pow­er and the rare abil­i­ty to chide you and charm you at the same time. This cam­paign is about address­ing drunk dri­ving dif­fer­ent­ly than any­one has before, and she deliv­ers our mes­sage in a direct, unortho­dox way that will cap­ture people’s atten­tion and start con­ver­sa­tions.”

Triumph & Failure By The Numbers

There’s cer­tain­ly no short­age of Super Bowl ad analy­sis to deter­mine whether this was the case. The spot itself has a respectable 5.3 mil­lion views on YouTube, but, as not­ed, Budweiser’s Super Bowl spots are no ordi­nary ads, which means 5.3 mil­lion is still well shy of fig­ures the brand is accus­tomed to see­ing for its Super Bowl con­tent. To wit: Bud­weis­er came into Super Bowl 50 as the reign­ing back-to-back-to-back champ of USA Today’s Ad Meter, a poll in which con­sumers rate Super Bowl ads and which is wide­ly con­sid­ered the de fac­to mea­sure of suc­cess. And, per ad tech firm Vis­i­ble Mea­sures, Budweiser’s 2015 Ad Meter win­ner, Lost Dog, has what it calls a True Reach view­er­ship of 70.3 mil­lion. True Reach includes views of an orig­i­nal video upload and relat­ed user-uploaded con­tent on YouTube, Face­book, Vimeo, Dai­ly­Mo­tion, Col­lege Humor, AOL and “hun­dreds of oth­er prop­er­ties,” a rep says. Fur­ther, Vis­i­ble Mea­sures says Budweiser’s 2014 Ad Meter win­ner, Pup­py Love, has a True Reach of 66.6 mil­lion views and the 2013 win­ner, Broth­er­hood, has 30.3 mil­lion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0HI4DAmVDo

The True Reach for Sim­ply Put: Also 30.3 mil­lion. But it’s worth not­ing True Reach includes total views to date from the time a video debuts, so Broth­er­hood has a three-year head­start. And while Bud­weis­er had to hand its Ad Meter crown to Hyundai this year, Mir­ren still gave Bud­weis­er its top-ranked 2016 spot, com­ing in at #9. (Budweiser’s oth­er entry, Not Back­ing Down, was #28.) Then again, there’s ana­lyt­ics firm comScore’s analy­sis of sec­ond-by-sec­ond TV view­ing on Super Bowl Sun­day, which found Budweiser’s Mir­ren spot was the clear leader. It’s also worth not­ing that for each use of the hash­tag #GiveADamn through mid­night on Feb­ru­ary 7, Bud­weis­er said it would spend $1 on safe ride home pro­grams up to $1 mil­lion. (It also launched StandWithBud.com, which pro­vides trans­porta­tion options based on loca­tion, to “encour­age fans to find safe rides home.”) The hash­tag also auto­mat­i­cal­ly trig­gered in-tweet emo­jis that Bud­weis­er said would “facil­i­tate addi­tion­al shares of the cam­paign mes­sage.” Budweiser Mirren And, per hash­tag track­er Hash­track­ing, #GiveADamn has been used in pub­lic tweets near­ly 42,000 times since mid­night on Feb­ru­ary 6.

Did It Make Any Damn Impact?

So while per­haps not as suc­cess­ful as some of its oth­er recent Super Bowl spots, it’s hard to pan Sim­ply Put as an abject fail­ure. At the same time, there’s some hes­i­ta­tion to call Sim­ply Put a run­away suc­cess. Heinz’s per­for­mance with Wiener Stam­pede could indi­cate Amer­i­ca want­ed pup­pies and Budweiser’s piv­ot to Mir­ren was a strate­gic error. But is there more to it than that?

Go Home, Budweiser, You’re Drunk

Rebec­ca Brooks, a founder of Alter Agents Mar­ket Research, said the ad is a dis­con­nect in part because Mir­ren is not a fig­ure the typ­i­cal Bud­weis­er cus­tomer would respond to. While acknowl­edg­ing anoth­er fig­ure would dra­mat­i­cal­ly change the tone of the ad, Brooks said a beloved foot­ball leg­end like Troy Aik­man, Howie Long, John Elway, or Jer­ry Rice – fig­ures the tar­get audi­ence would have iden­ti­fied with more eas­i­ly — would have been more pow­er­ful. Fur­ther, Brooks not­ed that while the ad has an ele­ment of humor, it cov­ers a seri­ous top­ic many Super Bowl par­ty­go­ers won’t want to lis­ten to. “It can eas­i­ly be argued that the Super Bowl is the per­fect time to remind peo­ple not to drink and dri­ve, but I’m unsure the audi­ence is going to be recep­tive,” Brooks added. Erik Her­nan­dez, a cre­ative direc­tor and part­ner at adver­tis­ing agency Tilt­ed Chair Cre­ative, is more blunt. “ ‘Who is this old lady eat­ing a burg­er in an emp­ty five-star restau­rant?’ That is what every­one will be think­ing or say­ing to the per­son next to them as they watch the anti-drunk-dri­ving spot for Bud­weis­er at the Super Bowl,” Her­nan­dez said, liken­ing it to “the guy who shows up in padded span­dex shorts to a bik­er bar.” And, per Jes­si­ca Thiele, mar­ket­ing man­ag­er of data inte­gra­tion ser­vices provider Vir­tu­al Logis­tics, Sim­ply Put is Budweiser’s “lame attempt at appear­ing social­ly respon­si­ble while invest­ing the least amount of hon­est, social­ly respon­si­ble effort pos­si­ble.” The result, she said, is an ad that comes off as vain, shal­low and preachy.

Cheers, Budweiser

But not every­one agrees the spot itself or its cast­ing choice was a mis­take. In fact, oth­er mar­keters say the bold move paid off and could reflect a shift in depic­tions of women in adver­tis­ing over­all. First, there’s Mirren’s age, which is more than twice that of Budweiser’s typ­i­cal cam­paign tar­get of 21- to 34-year-olds. Alex Fuller, cre­ative direc­tor at cre­ative agency Struck, said it was brave for Bud­weis­er to open­ly acknowl­edge drunk dri­ving, but also to cast Mir­ren and there­by “to sound­ly con­front the clas­sic myth of the crone.” At the oth­er end of the arche­type spec­trum are tra­di­tion­al Super Bowl ingénues like Bar Refaeli, Kate Upton, and Char­lotte McK­in­ney. “Whether they appear in ancient Norse myths or mod­ern-day beer com­mer­cials, this arche­type is usu­al­ly good-natured and appeal­ing, if often sub­mis­sive, safe and one-dimen­sion­al,” Fuller said. “The arche­typ­al char­ac­ter of the crone is much more com­plex. She is often por­trayed as a witch or sin­is­ter in man­ner – some of the neg­a­tive com­ments on Budweiser’s YouTube chan­nel call Mir­ren a “hag,” an “ugly old nag” [and worse]. But equal­ly, the crone fig­ure is a wise woman who rep­re­sents knowl­edge, free­dom, and per­son­al pow­er.” Per Fuller, this means Mir­ren is self-aware and con­fi­dent enough to tell the audi­ence to, “Stop it,” in a way that shames us “and yet, unlike the clas­sic crones of myth, she retains a mod­ern beau­ty and even sex­u­al­i­ty, which she wears with the non­cha­lance of a foot­ball jer­sey.” Kate Cana­da Obre­gon, chief strat­e­gy offi­cer of cre­ative agency Oishii Cre­ative, agreed Mir­ren is per­fect­ly cast. “She’s tal­ent­ed and savvy enough to know she may not be the Super Bowl tar­get audi­ences’ ide­al woman,” Obre­gon said. “She’s play­ing to our expec­ta­tions about what kind of women should star in an ad, and what we can expect women to say and do in ads.” That, in turn, demands atten­tion because it out­smarts expec­ta­tions about gen­der, and yet it still doesn’t mor­al­ize. It also deft­ly crafts pub­lic aware­ness using the tropes of humor and gen­der and carves out a space for once ho-hum pub­lic-ser­vice-type ads, she added. “I would love to say that this ad could also have been deliv­ered by a bux­omy young actress, but would we then have ques­tioned Bud­weis­er’s inten­tions?” asks Aure­lie Guer­ri­eri, co-pres­i­dent of Women in Wire­less, a non­prof­it that said it “empow­ers and devel­ops female lead­ers in mobile and dig­i­tal media.” “Mir­ren grants the mes­sage cred­i­bil­i­ty based on a whole career of achieve­ments.” Fur­ther, Daniela Cuevas, cre­ative direc­tor at dig­i­tal and social agency The Spark Group, said Mir­ren was the right pick in part because she’s a classy lady — and a Dame at that — who we don’t nec­es­sar­i­ly expect to drink beer. “If this were a younger actress, we wouldn’t prob­a­bly give it this much atten­tion, but because it’s some­one we don’t expect to have a beer, it makes the mes­sage much more effec­tive,” she added. “We’re so used to ads dur­ing the Super Bowl slap­ping a famous young face on the screen, but see­ing Mir­ren deliv­er such a clear mes­sage from a sea­soned, old­er-and-wis­er per­sona def­i­nite­ly caught con­sumers’ atten­tion effec­tive­ly.”

A Notoriously Frank & Uncensored British Lady’

Then, of course, there’s her oth­er­ness. Cuevas said the choice of a British actress means the spot has an air of author­i­ty that makes Amer­i­can con­sumers “auto­mat­i­cal­ly stop and lis­ten to what she’s say­ing.” While her accent alone ele­vates the mes­sage, her per­sona also exudes author­i­ty, Cuevas said. “There’s no jok­ing around with this woman,” Cuevas said. “Bud­weis­er made this ad to get to the point, plain and sim­ple, and they chose some­one unex­pect­ed to get your atten­tion unabashed­ly.” Obre­gon agreed. “The spot starts with her sit­ting ram­rod straight with a beer, burg­er and fries, and a whim­si­cal monar­chi­cal smile across her lips. As the cam­era moves in and with a slight tilt of her head, she sug­gests a com­ing moment, but we’re not sure what that will be. Is she going to lec­ture us in full British class flour­ish? Are we about to be barbed by the likes of a Down­ton dowa­ger?” Obre­gon said. “But wait. In an instant, Mirren’s shoul­ders gen­tly drop and the mood light­ens. She’s less a stereo­type and then seizes the moment to embark on a Mon­ty-Python-esque spew fest, deliv­er­ing insults, name call­ing and well-craft­ed put-downs.” At the end, the audi­ence is “rapt with the ban­ter and she’s no longer a Dame or a woman, but a smart per­son call­ing us out to be bet­ter humans,” she added. Then again, while Thiele agreed a British actress has an air of author­i­ty over view­ers in North Amer­i­ca, which roman­ti­cizes her accent, Thiele’s take is that this fur­ther cements Mirren’s posi­tion as a nag­ging moth­er-like fig­ure, con­tribut­ing to the spot’s afore­men­tioned preach­i­ness. “Yet she was clear­ly Amer­i­can­ized in the ad, sit­ting in a booth eat­ing a burg­er and fries. It’s a strange jux­ta­po­si­tion,” Thiele added. How­ev­er, Emi­ly McIn­er­ney, also a co-pres­i­dent of Women in Wire­less, said the loca­tion and props helped Bud­weis­er stay true to is brand while deliv­er­ing a tricky mes­sage in an impact­ful way.

A Dark Horse (Clydesdale?)

Ryan Berman, chief cre­ative offi­cer of adver­tis­ing firm the i.d.e.a. Brand, not­ed that a con­fi­dent woman tak­ing cen­ter stage solo in a beer com­mer­cial is a new con­cept and gives Bud­weis­er cred­it for its less-is-more route that is “a sim­ple, slow zoom that ham­mers home a mean­ing­ful mes­sage you can’t real­ly dis­agree with.” His opin­ion? There’s anoth­er vic­tor here entire­ly. “If you ask me who I think the unde­ni­able win­ner is with this com­mer­cial, it’s Uber,” he said. “I can’t help but imag­ine Uber CEO Travis Kalan­ick smil­ing while watch­ing this.”

Lisa Lacy

Written by Lisa Lacy

Lisa is a senior features writer for Inked. She also previously covered digital marketing for Incisive Media. Her background includes editorial positions at Dow Jones, the Financial Times, the Huffington Post, AOL, Amazon, Hearst, Martha Stewart Living and the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund.

Inked is published by Linkdex, the SEO platform of choice for professional marketers.

Discover why brands and agencies choose Linkdex

  • Get started fast with easy onboarding & training
  • Import and connect data from other platforms
  • Scale with your business, websites and markets
  • Up-skill teams with training & accreditation
  • Build workflows with tasks, reporting and alerts

Get a free induction and experience of Linkdex.

Just fill out this form, and one of our team members will get in touch to arrange your own, personalised demo.